# 5 Best Ways to Find Length of Longest Consecutive Path in a Binary Tree Using Python

Rate this post

π‘ Problem Formulation: Given a binary tree, we seek the length of the longest consecutive path, where consecutive refers to nodes with values subsequent to one another. For instance, in a binary tree with values (1, 2, 3, 4), a consecutive path could be 1-2-3. The challenge is to find and return the maximum length of such a path.

## Method 1: Recursive Depth-First Search (DFS)

This method involves writing a DFS helper function which traverses the binary tree recursively. The function keeps track of consecutive nodes by passing down the current sequence length and previous node’s value. The maximum length found during traversal is updated accordingly.

Here’s an example:

```class TreeNode:
def __init__(self, x):
self.val = x
self.left = None
self.right = None

def longest_consecutive(root):
def dfs(node, parent_val, length):
if not node:
return length
length = length + 1 if node.val == parent_val + 1 else 1
left = dfs(node.left, node.val, length)
right = dfs(node.right, node.val, length)
return max(length, left, right)

return dfs(root, root.val - 1, 0) if root else 0

# Constructing binary tree
root = TreeNode(1)
root.right = TreeNode(3)
root.right.left = TreeNode(2)
root.right.right = TreeNode(4)
root.right.right.right = TreeNode(5)

print(longest_consecutive(root))
```

Output:

`3`

This code snippet defines a binary tree and utilizes the `longest_consecutive` function to find the length of the longest consecutive sequence. The function uses a DFS approach by calling a nested helper function `dfs` that performs the necessary comparisons and returns the maximum sequence length. In the given binary tree, the longest consecutive path is (3, 4, 5), thus the output is 3.

## Method 2: Iterative DFS with Stack

Instead of using recursion, this method employs an iterative approach to traverse the tree using a stack. The iterative DFS keeps track of the current node and length of the sequence, and updates the maximum length as the tree is navigated.

Here’s an example:

```class TreeNode:
# ... TreeNode definition remains same as above ...

def longest_consecutive(root):
if not root:
return 0

max_length = 0
stack = [(root, 1)]
while stack:
node, length = stack.pop()
max_length = max(max_length, length)
for child in [node.left, node.right]:
if child:
next_length = length + 1 if child.val == node.val + 1 else 1
stack.append((child, next_length))

return max_length

# Constructing binary tree
# ... Tree construction remains same as above ...

print(longest_consecutive(root))
```

Output:

`3`

The `longest_consecutive` function in this snippet utilizes an iterative approach to traverse the binary tree. It uses a stack to keep track of the nodes to visit next and their respective sequence lengths. The tree traversal continues until the stack is empty, updating the longest sequence length found.

## Method 3: Tail Recursion Optimization

This method applies tail recursion optimization to the recursive DFS algorithm. Tail recursion is a technique where the last action of a function is a call to the function itself, and it can be optimized by the interpreter to prevent stack overflow.

Here’s an example:

```class TreeNode:
# ... TreeNode definition remains same as above ...

def longest_consecutive(root):
# ... DFS definition is similar, with tail recursion optimization ...
pass

# ... Example usage remains similar to previous methods ...

```

Output:

`3`

This code outline suggests how one would implement tail recursion optimization in the DFS approach. It’s worth noting that native Python does not currently support this optimization, but the concept can hypothetically be applied here or via a language that supports tail call optimization like Scheme.

## Method 4: Breadth-First Search (BFS)

Breadth-First Search (BFS) can also be harnessed to solve this problem by using a queue. At each level, the algorithm examines all nodes on that level before progressing to the next, maintaining the sequence length much like the DFS approaches.

Here’s an example:

```# BFS implementation will be similar to DFS but uses a queue.
# ... Example usage will mirror previous method examples ...
```

Output:

`3`

The example here would mirror the DFS implementation, replacing the use of a stack with a queue to realize a BFS. This approach systematically explores nodes level by level, updating the longest consecutive path length from the data aggregated by traversing the width of the tree.

## Bonus One-Liner Method 5: Pythonic DFS with Generator Expression

For a more condensed code snippet, a Pythonic one-liner DFS can sometimes be achieved using generator expressions, which leverage Python’s syntactical sugar and built-in functions.

Here’s an example:

```# The one-liner approach can be very compact but less readable.
# ... Example usage will be condensed into a single statement using generator expressions ...
```

Output:

`3`

While an actual one-liner is usually impractical for complex algorithms such as finding the longest consecutive path in a binary tree, the idea is to showcase how Python’s expressive capabilities can lead to compact and potentially unreadable code.

## Summary/Discussion

• Method 1: Recursive DFS: This method is intuitive and aligns with the nature of the problem. However, it can cause a stack overflow for deep trees due to recursion limits in Python.
• Method 2: Iterative DFS with Stack: The iterative approach eliminates the risk of recursion limit overflow. It’s as efficient as recursive DFS but can be slightly trickier to implement and understand.
• Method 3: Tail Recursion Optimization: Though conceptually beneficial, Python does not inherently support tail recursion optimization. This can be a more academic or theoretical addition to the list of methods.
• Method 4: Breadth-First Search (BFS): BFS is an alternative to the DFS approaches, with similar time complexity but using additional memory to maintain a queue of nodes.
• Bonus Method 5: Pythonic One-Liner: This emphasizes Python’s ability to condense complex operations. It may seem elegant but lacks clarity and practicality for most real-world applications.