5 Best Ways to Merge In Between Linked Lists in Python

πŸ’‘ Problem Formulation: Merging linked lists is a fundamental operation in data structures that is often required in various applications. Specifically, the goal is to insert one linked list into another at specified positions. For instance, consider two linked lists A and B, and we want to insert B into A at positions i and j. Hence, the input would be two linked lists and two indices, and the desired output is a single linked list with B merged in between the i-th and j-th node of A.

Method 1: Iterative Approach

Using an iterative approach to merge linked lists involves iterating over the first linked list until reaching the insertion point, linking it to the head of the second list, then finding the end of the second list and linking it back to the remainder of the first list. This method ensures an efficient in-place merge without the need for additional data structures.

Here’s an example:

class ListNode:
    def __init__(self, value=0, next=None):
        self.value = value
        self.next = next

def merge_in_between(list1, list2, a, b):
    head1, head2 = list1, list2
    prev, tail = None, None

    # Iterate to the node before the 'a-th' node
    for _ in range(a-1):
        head1 = head1.next
    prev = head1
 
    # Find the 'b+1-th' node and its previous node
    for _ in range(b-a+2):
        head1 = head1.next
    tail = head1
  
    # Merge in between
    prev.next = head2
    while head2.next:
        head2 = head2.next
    head2.next = tail

    return list1

# Example usage:
# Assuming we have two linked lists and want to merge list2 
# into list1 starting at position 3 and ending at position 4:
list1 = ListNode(0, ListNode(1, ListNode(2, ListNode(3, ListNode(4, ListNode(5))))))
list2 = ListNode(1000, ListNode(1001, ListNode(1002)))
merged_list = merge_in_between(list1, list2, 3, 4)

The output will be a single list: 0->1->2->1000->1001->1002->5.

The code defines a merge_in_between() function that takes two linked lists and two indices a and b. It connects the part before index a of the first list with the head of the second list, then traverses to the end of the second list and reconnects the tail to the part after index b from the first list.

Method 2: Using Dummy Nodes

Utilizing dummy nodes is a practice to simplify the merge process, making corner cases such as inserting before the head or after the tail of a list easier to handle. A dummy node acts as a placeholder to manage links easily without additional checks for special conditions.

Here’s an example:

# Assuming the ListNode class is already defined as in Method 1

def merge_in_between(list1, list2, a, b):
    dummy = ListNode(0)
    dummy.next = list1
    prev = dummy

    # Iterate to the node before the 'a-th' node using the dummy
    for _ in range(a):
        prev = prev.next
    
    # Find the 'b+1-th' node
    tail = prev
    for _ in range(b-a+1):
        tail = tail.next

    # Merge in between using the dummy
    prev.next = list2
    while list2.next:
        list2 = list2.next
    list2.next = tail.next

    return dummy.next

# Example usage is similar to that outlined in Method 1

The output will be identical to that of Method 1: the merged list with list2 in between nodes a and b of list1.

This method begins by creating a dummy node that is linked to the head of the first list, which then allows us to easily navigate and merge without concern for edge cases. Afterwards, the remaining links are adjusted just like in Method 1.

Method 3: Recursion

Recursion can be employed to simplify the merging operation by reducing the procedural iteration to a series of function calls. This is particularly effective when the insertion point is toward the end of the list, reducing the need for explicit iterations over the majority of elements.

Here’s an example:

# Assuming the ListNode class is already defined as in Method 1

def merge_in_between(list1, list2, a, b):
    if a == 1:  # Base case for recursion
        last_node_of_list2 = list2
        while last_node_of_list2.next:
            last_node_of_list2 = last_node_of_list2.next
        last_node_of_list2.next = merge_in_between(list1, None, a, b-1)
        return list2
        
    if b == 0:
        return list1.next

    list1.next = merge_in_between(list1.next, list2, a-1, b-1)
    return list1

# Example usage is similar to that outlined in Method 1

The output will again be consistent with previous methods: the merged list with the second list inserted between nodes a and b of the first list.

This recursive function handles the merging by first checking the base case of reaching the insertion point for list2 and then progressing toward the end of list1 with reduced indices until reaching the end of the merge interval. The recursion simplifies the linking process but may not be as efficient with large lists due to stack depth limitations.

Method 4: Using Slicing

While traditional linked list operations do not support slicing as in arrays, we can simulate this behavior by copying nodes to an array, performing the slice operation, and rebuilding the linked list from the resulting array. This approach is less efficient due to the additional space and time required for copying but offers a more intuitive workflow akin to working with arrays.

Here’s an example:

# Assuming the ListNode class is already defined as in Method 1

def to_array(head):
    arr = []
    while head:
        arr.append(head.value)
        head = head.next
    return arr

def to_linked_list(arr):
    dummy = current = ListNode(0)
    for value in arr:
        current.next = ListNode(value)
        current = current.next
    return dummy.next

def merge_in_between(list1, list2, a, b):
    arr1 = to_array(list1)
    arr2 = to_array(list2)
    merged_arr = arr1[:a] + arr2 + arr1[b+1:]
    return to_linked_list(merged_arr)

# Example usage is similar to that outlined in Method 1

The output will remain the same: a single merged list with the second list spliced into the first.

By converting the linked lists to arrays, this method allows for easy slicing based on the provided indices. Once the merging is completed on the array level, a new linked list is constructed from the merged array. Although intuitive, this method requires extra memory and may not be suitable for all scenarios due to its lower performance.

Bonus One-Liner Method 5: Using List Comprehension

Similar to Method 4 but more concise, list comprehension in Python can be used to create one combined list which is then used to build the merged linked list. Caution is advised, as this may compromise readability for the sake of brevity, and it comes with the same performance considerations.

Here’s an example:

# Assuming to_array() and to_linked_list() as defined in Method 4

def merge_in_between(list1, list2, a, b):
    return to_linked_list(to_array(list1)[:a] + to_array(list2) + to_array(list1)[b+1:])

# Example usage is similar to that outlined in Method 1

The output will be the familiar merged list with the elements of list2 inserted between the a and b indices of list1.

Expressed in a single return statement, this method uses list comprehension to concatenate portions of an array that represent the linked lists. The comprehension makes the code compact but may impair understanding for those unfamiliar with the techniques used.

Summary/Discussion

  • Method 1: Iterative Approach. This method is efficient and straightforward, with no additional space complexity. However, it can be verbose and a bit complex for understanding boundaries and connections.
  • Method 2: Using Dummy Nodes. Dummy nodes simplify edge-case handling and can make the code cleaner. The downside is the minor overhead of handling an extra dummy node.
  • Method 3: Recursion. Offers a clean and elegant solution, but can lead to a stack overflow with very long lists and is less efficient due to function call overhead.
  • Method 4: Using Slicing. Intuitive and easy to understand, it mimics array manipulation. The drawback is the additional time and memory required to convert the list to and from an array.
  • Method 5: Using List Comprehension. It’s a neat one-liner but may be difficult to parse at a glance. It shares the same performance and memory usage issues as Method 4.