# 5 Best Ways to Replace Elements by the Smallest Term at Their Left Side in Python

Rate this post

π‘ Problem Formulation: In Python, we often face the task of transforming a list by replacing each element with the smallest preceding element. It’s a common challenge when dealing with optimizations or specific algorithms. For example, given the input array `[3, 7, 4, 8, 2]`, the desired output would be `[None, 3, 3, 4, 3]` because there is no element to the left of the first item, and the smallest items to the left of the others are as displayed in the output.

## Method 1: Iterative Approach

This method involves initializing a variable to track the smallest value found so far while iterating through the list. The current item is replaced with this smallest value, which is updated if the current item is smaller. This method is straightforward and requires no additional data structures.

Here’s an example:

```def replace_with_smallest_left(arr):
if not arr:
return []
min_left = arr[0]
result = [None]
for i in range(1, len(arr)):
result.append(min_left)
if arr[i] < min_left:
min_left = arr[i]
return result

arr = [3, 7, 4, 8, 2]
print(replace_with_smallest_left(arr))
```

The output of this code snippet:

`[None, 3, 3, 4, 3]`

This code defines a function `replace_with_smallest_left()` which goes through each element in an array, and replaces it with the smallest number found to its left. The first element has nothing to its left, so it’s replaced with `None`. The function is simplistic and easy to use.

## Method 2: Using Python’s List Comprehension

Python’s list comprehension can provide a more concise syntax for this problem. It allows the compact expression of for-loop operations inside a list’s brackets. Hence, we can use the `min()` function alongside list slicing to achieve our task in a single line within a list comprehension, trading some readability for brevity.

Here’s an example:

```arr = [3, 7, 4, 8, 2]
result = [None if i == 0 else min(arr[:i]) for i in range(len(arr))]
print(result)
```

The output of this code snippet:

`[None, 3, 3, 4, 3]`

This code uses list comprehension to create a new list, where each element is the minimum of all elements before it in the input list `arr`. This is a quick and elegant solution for one-liners but might be less efficient due to repeated use of the `min()` function on sliced lists.

## Method 3: Using a Stack

Utilizing a stack data structure can be beneficial when you need to repeatedly access the last item seen. Initializing an empty stack and looping through the list while pushing and popping elements according to their value relative to the smallest seen so far can help maintain the correct state efficiently.

Here’s an example:

```def replace_with_smallest_left_stack(arr):
stack = []
result = []
for num in arr:
while stack and stack[-1] > num:
stack.pop()
result.append(stack[-1] if stack else None)
stack.append(num)
return result

arr = [3, 7, 4, 8, 2]
print(replace_with_smallest_left_stack(arr))
```

The output of this code snippet:

`[None, 3, 3, 4, 3]`

In this solution, we iterate over the list, using a stack to keep track of the smallest elements. The algorithm ensures that the stack is increasing, so the top element always represents the smallest element so far. This is a classic example of where a stack is an ideal data structure.

## Method 4: Using the Built-in functools Module

This approach involves leveraging Python’s `functools` module to maintain state across iterations in a functional style. Using the `functools.reduce()` function, we can elegantly compute the result in a single expression.

Here’s an example:

```from functools import reduce

def smallest_left_min(val, arr):
current_min, _ = val
return (min(current_min, arr), current_min)

arr = [3, 7, 4, 8, 2]
result = [None] + [new_min for _, new_min in reduce(smallest_left_min, arr, (arr[0], None))]
print(result)
```

The output:

`[None, 3, 3, 4, 3]`

This code snippet makes use of `functools.reduce()` to carry the smallest value so far and replace each element in the array with it. It is a compact solution that may appeal to those with a functional programming inclination.

## Bonus One-Liner Method 5: Using Zip and Accumulate

Python’s `itertools.accumulate()` function can be applied to iterate over the list, keep track of the minimum, and pair it with each element using `zip()`. This slick one-liner is likely the most Pythonic solution.

Here’s an example:

```from itertools import accumulate
arr = [3, 7, 4, 8, 2]
result = [None] + [previous for previous, current in zip(accumulate(arr, min), arr[1:])]
print(result)
```

The output:

`[None, 3, 3, 4, 3]`

This code uses the `accumulate()` method from itertools to maintain a running minimum, and zips the original list (minus the first element) with the accumulate()’s result to create the desired output. This method is elegant and leans on Python’s functional capabilities.

## Summary/Discussion

• Method 1: Iterative Approach. Easy to understand and implement. However, might be less efficient than other approaches due to its linear nature.
• Method 2: List Comprehension. Offers a concise solution. The downside is its inefficiency for larger lists due to repeating the minimum computation.
• Method 3: Using a Stack. Provides an effective way of keeping track of minimums and dealing with varying dimensions. Can lead to cleaner code but might be overcomplicating for the simple case.
• Method 4: Using functools. Employs a functional style that could be less intuitive for some users. Nevertheless, it is concise and powerful for those familiar with functional programming techniques.
• Method 5: Using Zip and Accumulate. An elegant, one-liner Pythonic approach. It might not be as explicit at first glance but is efficient and clever in use.