Syntax
object.__mod__(self, other)
The Python __mod__()
method implements the modulo operation %
that per default returns the remainder of dividing the left by the right operand. Internally, Python attempts to call x.__mod__(y)
to implement the modulo operation x%y
. If the method is not implemented, Python first attempts to call __rmod__
on the right operand and if this isn’t implemented either, it raises a TypeError
.
We call this a “Dunder Method” for “Double Underscore Method” (also called “magic method”). To get a list of all dunder methods with explanation, check out our dunder cheat sheet article on this blog.
Example
In the following example, you create a custom class Data
and overwrite the __mod__()
method so that it returns a dummy string when trying to calculate the modulo of two numbers.
class Data: def __mod__(self, other): return '... my result of mod...' a = Data() b = Data() c = a % b print(c) # ... my result of mod...
If you hadn’t defined the __m
od__()
method, Python would’ve raised a TypeError
.
How to Resolve TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for %
Consider the following code snippet where you try to calculate the modulo of two custom objects without defining the dunder method __mod__()
:
class Data: pass a = Data() b = Data() c = a % b print(c)
Running this leads to the following error message on my computer:
Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Users\xcent\Desktop\code.py", line 7, in <module> c = a % b TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for %: 'Data' and 'Data'
The reason for this error is that the __mod__()
dunder method has never been defined—and it is not defined for a custom object by default. So, to resolve the TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for %
, you need to provide the __mod__(self, other)
method in your class definition as shown previously:
class Data: def __mod__(self, other): return '... my result of mod...'
Python __mod__ vs __rmod__
Say, you want to calculate the modulo of two custom objects x
and y
:
print(x % y)
Python first tries to call the left object’s __mod__()
method x.__mod__(y)
. But this may fail for two reasons:
- The method
x.__mod__()
is not implemented in the first place, or - The method
x.__mod__()
is implemented but returns aNotImplemented
value indicating that the data types are incompatible.
If this fails, Python tries to fix it by calling the y.__rmod__()
for reverse modulo on the right operand y
.
If this method is implemented, Python knows that it doesn’t run into a potential problem of a non-commutative operation. If it would just execute y.__mod__(x)
instead of x.__mod__(y)
, the result would be wrong because the modulo operation is non-commutative. That’s why y.__rmod__(x)
is needed.
So, the difference between x.__mod__(y)
and x.__rmod__(y)
is that the former calculates x % y
whereas the latter calculates y % x
— both calling the respective modulo method defined on object x
.
You can see this in effect here where we attempt to call the modulo operation on the left operand x
—but as it’s not implemented, Python simply calls the reverse modulo operation on the right operand y
.
class Data_1: pass class Data_2: def __rmod__(self, other): return 'called rmod' x = Data_1() y = Data_2() print(x % y) # called rmod
References:
Explainer Video Modulo
You can also check out my explainer video where I’ll give you a deep dive on the built-in modulo operation and how to use them for various data types. Click to watch:
Where to Go From Here?
Enough theory. Let’s get some practice!
Coders get paid six figures and more because they can solve problems more effectively using machine intelligence and automation.
To become more successful in coding, solve more real problems for real people. That’s how you polish the skills you really need in practice. After all, what’s the use of learning theory that nobody ever needs?
You build high-value coding skills by working on practical coding projects!
Do you want to stop learning with toy projects and focus on practical code projects that earn you money and solve real problems for people?
🚀 If your answer is YES!, consider becoming a Python freelance developer! It’s the best way of approaching the task of improving your Python skills—even if you are a complete beginner.
If you just want to learn about the freelancing opportunity, feel free to watch my free webinar “How to Build Your High-Income Skill Python” and learn how I grew my coding business online and how you can, too—from the comfort of your own home.